Archive for May, 2009

Why is Health Insurance so Expensive?

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Many people ask “why is health insurance so expensive?” The obvious answer is that medical care is expensive. Then, why is medical care so expensive? Dr. Atul Gawande has written a seminal piece in the New Yorker that answers this vexing question. The article, entitled, The Cost Conundrum, explores why the per-capita cost of medical care is nearly the highest in the United States in McAllen, Texas.

Dr. Gawande explains that Medicare pays roughly $15,000 per person per year in this small border town, yet the median income is only $12,000 per year. “In other words, Medicare spends three thousand dollars more per person here than the average person earns.”

After examining and discarding some common explanations of why this small town pays so much for medical care (e.g., malpractice (Texas has a cap), unhealthy lifestyle (no worse than any place else), insurance company’s fault (it was MediCare payments – a government run program that was paying so much) Dr. Gawande concludes that “Health-care costs ultimately arise from the accumulation of individual decisions doctors make about which services and treatments to write an order for. The most expensive piece of medical equipment, as the saying goes, is a doctor’s pen.”

He cites the comments of an area hospital administrator describing the physicians in McAllen: “They had “entrepreneurial spirit,” he said. They were innovative and aggressive in finding ways to increase revenues from patient care. “There’s no lack of work ethic,” he said. But he had often seen financial considerations drive the decisions doctors made for patients — the tests they ordered, the doctors and hospitals they recommended – and it bothered him.”

Dr. Gawande concluded that within the past 15 years there had been a cultural shift in the medical profession in McAllen, Texas from doctors focusing on the medical outcomes of their patients to doctors viewing patients as a revenue stream.

As the article reported that “there are the physicians who see their practice primarily as a revenue stream. They instruct their secretary to have patients who call with follow-up questions schedule an appointment, because insurers don’t pay for phone calls, only office visits. They consider providing Botox injections for cash. They take a Doppler ultrasound course, buy a machine, and start doing their patients’ scans themselves, so that the insurance payments go to them rather than to the hospital. They figure out ways to increase their high-margin work and decrease their low-margin work. This is a business, after all.

“In every community, you’ll find a mixture of these views among physicians, but one or another tends to predominate. McAllen seems simply to be the community at one extreme.”

Dr. Gawande offers hope in the face of such a chilling conclusion. He points to the Mayo Clinic which operates high quality, low cost medical facilities in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida. They have successfully aligned the incentives of the hospital administrators, doctors, nurses, insurance companies, even the janitors to provide the best quality care to the patients. Often specialists confer about a single patient. A surgeon, internist, cardiologiest and others might discuss a case and together conclude on the best course of treatment. This collective decision making often reduces the number of tests performed, which reduces the cost of care – and increases the quality of care. Dr. Gawande reports that in high cost medical areas medical care is not necessarily better – it is just more expensive. He reports that more people die from medical mistakes than from automobile accidents.

Dr. Gawande writes, “somewhere in the United States at this moment, a patient with chest pain, or a tumor, or a cough is seeing a doctor. And the damning question we have to ask is whether the doctor is set up to meet the needs of the patient, first and foremost, or to maximize revenue.”

Federal Health Insurance Reform Likely to Increase the Cost in California

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Tomorrow, June 1, 2009, Senator Kennedy is supposed to release the report of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) Committee’s recommendations for comprehensive reform of the health care & health insurance system. Word has it that the Obama administration wants to pass health insurance reform legislation in 90 days. That does not give people much time to evaluate these complicated proposals that will have massive financial implications for everyone in our country.

To get an idea of what might be proposed, we can look at the Senate Finance Committee, led by Senator Baucus. This committiee has been releasing reports on various reform efforts. The Senate Finance Committee’s Policy Options paper on health insurance reform suggests many dramatic changes, including:
* Combining a individual and “micro-group” (companies with 2-10 employees) market;
* Offering “Guarantee issue” health insurance to this market segment;
* Requiring “modified community rating” for rates to this market segment;
* Creating a “national exchange” run by the government to sell health insurance to this market segment;
* Creating a “public/government” health insurance plan.

For an excellent summary of the Senate Finance Committee health care options report, see the report by the National Association of Health Underwriters, the health insurance agent organization, of which I have been a long time, active member.

Implications for California

All of the ideas listed above by Sen. Baucus’ Committee would dramatically increase the cost of health insurance in California. As difficult as it is to believe, in the high cost state of California, individuals pay the least amount for their health insurance according to this report by America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP.) Table 2 in this report shows that Californians pay about 1/3 the amount individuals pay for health insurance in New Jersey and Massachusetts and about half the amount paid by individuals in New York.

The really frightening thing is that media reports state that Senator Ted Kennedy wants to model the nation’s health insurance system after Massachusetts – the second highest cost state in the country.

In California we have age-banded rates, not community rating. This allows younger (likely healthier) people to purchase health insurance at a lower cost than older people. We have medical underwriting and not guaranteed issuance in the individual market. Medical underwriting prevents people from purchasing coverage only after they are sick and forcing them to pay for coverage while they are healthy. It may be unfair to the unhealthy but all must agree that this keeps the cost of medical insurance low for the millions of people who qualify for coverage in California’s individual market. California’s got an “exchange” in every health insurance agent who sells coverage. To see an excellent example of a health insurance exchange, click here and get a quote from BenefitsCafe.com.

All of the private sector provisions that keep health insurance affordable in California will likely get thrown out the window. So, Californians, get ready, you are about to pay about 2-3 times more for your health insurance.