Health Net Elect Open Access HMO is a Good Buy in Los Angeles

July 19th, 2009

In the California small group health insurance market Health Net’s HMO plans are always well priced. Effective August 1, 2009 for groups located in Los Angeles their Elect Open Access HMO plan will be 5 percent less expensive than the Health Net Standard Option HMO.

The Standard and the Elect Open Access (EOA) plans have exactly the same benefits in terms of doctor office visit charges, hospitalization charges and prescription medicine benefits. In fact, the EOA plans have the additional benefit of allowing members to self-refer to any Health Net PPO provider for a consultation. The member pays $15 more than the primary care doctor office visit when seeing a PPO provider, but the member has the freedom to access this care.

So, the obvious question is how can the plan that allows access to PPO doctors for consultations cost less than the standard HMO? More benefits (almost)always means higher cost. There are two reasons the EOA plan costs less than the Standard HMO in Los Angeles:

1) Health Net filed the plan as a “POS” or Point-Of-Service plan which allows some cost sharing with the medical groups. This results in lower payments or “capitation” to the medical groups. The medical groups share in money from a reserve fund set aside to cover the out-of-network PPO services. If few people see PPO doctors for consultations part of the left over money goes back to the medical group and to Health Net. The members also benefit because they’ve paid a lower premium.

2) UCLA Medical Center does not participate in the Elect Open Access plan. UCLA Medical Center is a high-cost facility and apparently refused to accept the lower reimbursement rates.

So, if your Los Angeles based small business (2 – 50 employees) doesn’t need to use UCLA Medical Center and you want a rich benefit HMO, Health Net’s Elect Open Access HMO may be a very good choice. Click here to get a California Small Group Health Insurance Quote.

Health Insurance Information for College Students

June 23rd, 2009

With summer and graduation upon us, we wanted to help people understand issues related to college health insurance.

Incoming freshmen have different concerns than recent grads; who have different needs than graduate students and we’ve written an article for each situation. Parents of these students will also find these articles helpful.

In addition, we’ve written an introduction to health insurance and an overview of college health plans – including specific steps to determine if enrolling in your college’s health plan is a wise decision.

The learning curve to understand health insurance is often steep. We hope these articles will flatten the curve a bit.

Significant Anthem Blue Cross California Small Group Changes Effective July 1, 2009

June 11th, 2009

Anthem Blue Cross of California announced that they will be making major changes to their small group health insurance plans effective July 1, 2009. Specifically, they will be adding 14 new plans. Beginning January 1, 2010, Anthem Blue Cross will discontinue 9 plans.

Anthem calls their entire portfolio of small business medical plans Employee Elect with additional portfolios referred to as Employee Choice and BeneFits. During the past 10 years the Employee Elect portfolio has grown from 12 plans to 29. With these changes Anthem Blue Cross will offer 34 plans in their Employee Elect portfolio, including 10 HMO plans. For many years Anthem Blue Cross only offered 3 HMOs: the 100%; Classic $250; and the Saver HMO.

According to Anthem Blue Cross, their research about consumer preferences indicates that people want many choices. The large selection of plans addresses this preference. A small business in California (2-50 employees) can offer all 34 plans to their employees at one time.

To help make sense of the many plans, Anthem Blue Cross has grouped the plans into “families” or “suites” of plans. The plans in each family function the same way but have different deductibles, copayments, and out-of-pocket limits. Here are the families of plans in the new Employee Elect portfolio:
* Premier PPO - rich benefit plans that pay “reasonable & customary” out of network;
* Copay PPO - Moderate deductible plans with Dr. Office visits before the deductible;
* Gen Rx PPO - comprehensive benefits but no brand medicine;
* Solution - High deductible PPO plans with Dr. Office visits & Rx before the deductible;
* Lumenos HIA+ – HRA style plans with first dollar coverage then a deductible, Rx after the medical deductible;
* Lumenos HSA (100/70) – plans pay 100% after the deductible with new 3-tier Rx benefits (previously there was no copayment for Rx after the deductible – but non-formulary medicine was not covered);
* Lumenos HSA (80/70) – lower premium HSA plans with co-insurance after the deductible;
* Elements Hospital - these are basic hospital only plans with very limited – if any out of hospital benefits and Rx benefits;
* EPO - in network only benefits suitable for “wrap products” that are like an HRA and pay expenses prior to the deductible; and,
* HMO - there are 10 HMO plans grouped in 4 categories: 100% hospital; Classic; Saver and Select.

You can obtain quotes for all of the new Anthem Blue Cross small group health insurance plans by clicking here. Don’t hesitate to call us if you have any questions.

Blue Shield Savings 3500 and 5200 HSA Compatible Health Plans with a Bridge Rider

June 2nd, 2009

July 1, 2009 – Blue Shield of California is introducing two new, innovative individual and family health insurance plans that are Health Savings Account (HSA) compatible. The truly innovative feature of these plans is that they offer enrollees an opportunity to also enroll in a “rider” (extra feature at an additional cost) that will pay them money should they have a qualifying stay in the hospital during the first 12 months of coverage.

Read the full article about Blue Shield Savings 3500 and 5200 HSA compatible plans.

Blue Shield California Individual Plan Rate Increase July 1, 2009

June 2nd, 2009

Blue Shield of California has announced that they will raise rates on many of their individual and family plans effective July 1, 2009. The rate increases state-wide range from +7% for the Vital Shield plans; +14-15% for the Balance Plans; and a whopping +23-24% for the Essential 1750 plan. These are state-wide averages and some people could experience larger increases.

The Essential 1750 has been a very popular plan. Apparently its relatively low price and solid benefits have led to lots of people enrolling who have used more medical services than Blue Shield originally intended. Nobody likes to see 20+% rate increases – not even the insurance companies.

Blue Shield offers newly enrolled members a 12 month rate guarantee so rates impact new enrollees and current enrolless as they come off of their rate guarantee period. People who want to offset the rate increase can down grade to a lower cost plan. Sometimes Blue Shield of California requires medical underwriting in order to change plans. To figure out which plan you can change to without medical underwriting, contact us at BenefitsCafe.com, 800-746-0045. We can assist you with this.

If you would like to evaluate other Blue Shield health insurance plans or comparable plans from Anthem Blue Cross, Health Net or Aetna, you can get a quote here. This simplified individual and family Blue Shield plan comparison guide can assist you in comparing plans. This comprehensive plan benefit description guide has a great deal of information on all of the Blue Shield plans.

Why is Health Insurance so Expensive?

May 31st, 2009

Many people ask “why is health insurance so expensive?” The obvious answer is that medical care is expensive. Then, why is medical care so expensive? Dr. Atul Gawande has written a seminal piece in the New Yorker that answers this vexing question. The article, entitled, The Cost Conundrum, explores why the per-capita cost of medical care is nearly the highest in the United States in McAllen, Texas.

Dr. Gawande explains that Medicare pays roughly $15,000 per person per year in this small border town, yet the median income is only $12,000 per year. “In other words, Medicare spends three thousand dollars more per person here than the average person earns.”

After examining and discarding some common explanations of why this small town pays so much for medical care (e.g., malpractice (Texas has a cap), unhealthy lifestyle (no worse than any place else), insurance company’s fault (it was MediCare payments – a government run program that was paying so much) Dr. Gawande concludes that “Health-care costs ultimately arise from the accumulation of individual decisions doctors make about which services and treatments to write an order for. The most expensive piece of medical equipment, as the saying goes, is a doctor’s pen.”

He cites the comments of an area hospital administrator describing the physicians in McAllen: “They had “entrepreneurial spirit,” he said. They were innovative and aggressive in finding ways to increase revenues from patient care. “There’s no lack of work ethic,” he said. But he had often seen financial considerations drive the decisions doctors made for patients — the tests they ordered, the doctors and hospitals they recommended – and it bothered him.”

Dr. Gawande concluded that within the past 15 years there had been a cultural shift in the medical profession in McAllen, Texas from doctors focusing on the medical outcomes of their patients to doctors viewing patients as a revenue stream.

As the article reported that “there are the physicians who see their practice primarily as a revenue stream. They instruct their secretary to have patients who call with follow-up questions schedule an appointment, because insurers don’t pay for phone calls, only office visits. They consider providing Botox injections for cash. They take a Doppler ultrasound course, buy a machine, and start doing their patients’ scans themselves, so that the insurance payments go to them rather than to the hospital. They figure out ways to increase their high-margin work and decrease their low-margin work. This is a business, after all.

“In every community, you’ll find a mixture of these views among physicians, but one or another tends to predominate. McAllen seems simply to be the community at one extreme.”

Dr. Gawande offers hope in the face of such a chilling conclusion. He points to the Mayo Clinic which operates high quality, low cost medical facilities in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida. They have successfully aligned the incentives of the hospital administrators, doctors, nurses, insurance companies, even the janitors to provide the best quality care to the patients. Often specialists confer about a single patient. A surgeon, internist, cardiologiest and others might discuss a case and together conclude on the best course of treatment. This collective decision making often reduces the number of tests performed, which reduces the cost of care – and increases the quality of care. Dr. Gawande reports that in high cost medical areas medical care is not necessarily better – it is just more expensive. He reports that more people die from medical mistakes than from automobile accidents.

Dr. Gawande writes, “somewhere in the United States at this moment, a patient with chest pain, or a tumor, or a cough is seeing a doctor. And the damning question we have to ask is whether the doctor is set up to meet the needs of the patient, first and foremost, or to maximize revenue.”

Federal Health Insurance Reform Likely to Increase the Cost in California

May 31st, 2009

Tomorrow, June 1, 2009, Senator Kennedy is supposed to release the report of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) Committee’s recommendations for comprehensive reform of the health care & health insurance system. Word has it that the Obama administration wants to pass health insurance reform legislation in 90 days. That does not give people much time to evaluate these complicated proposals that will have massive financial implications for everyone in our country.

To get an idea of what might be proposed, we can look at the Senate Finance Committee, led by Senator Baucus. This committiee has been releasing reports on various reform efforts. The Senate Finance Committee’s Policy Options paper on health insurance reform suggests many dramatic changes, including:
* Combining a individual and “micro-group” (companies with 2-10 employees) market;
* Offering “Guarantee issue” health insurance to this market segment;
* Requiring “modified community rating” for rates to this market segment;
* Creating a “national exchange” run by the government to sell health insurance to this market segment;
* Creating a “public/government” health insurance plan.

For an excellent summary of the Senate Finance Committee health care options report, see the report by the National Association of Health Underwriters, the health insurance agent organization, of which I have been a long time, active member.

Implications for California

All of the ideas listed above by Sen. Baucus’ Committee would dramatically increase the cost of health insurance in California. As difficult as it is to believe, in the high cost state of California, individuals pay the least amount for their health insurance according to this report by America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP.) Table 2 in this report shows that Californians pay about 1/3 the amount individuals pay for health insurance in New Jersey and Massachusetts and about half the amount paid by individuals in New York.

The really frightening thing is that media reports state that Senator Ted Kennedy wants to model the nation’s health insurance system after Massachusetts – the second highest cost state in the country.

In California we have age-banded rates, not community rating. This allows younger (likely healthier) people to purchase health insurance at a lower cost than older people. We have medical underwriting and not guaranteed issuance in the individual market. Medical underwriting prevents people from purchasing coverage only after they are sick and forcing them to pay for coverage while they are healthy. It may be unfair to the unhealthy but all must agree that this keeps the cost of medical insurance low for the millions of people who qualify for coverage in California’s individual market. California’s got an “exchange” in every health insurance agent who sells coverage. To see an excellent example of a health insurance exchange, click here and get a quote from BenefitsCafe.com.

All of the private sector provisions that keep health insurance affordable in California will likely get thrown out the window. So, Californians, get ready, you are about to pay about 2-3 times more for your health insurance.

Wellpoint teams with XPrize to Solve Health Insurance Crisis

March 31st, 2009

Wellpoint, the largest health insurance company in the United States, and parent company of Anthem Blue Cross of California, is partnering with the XPrize to develop a solution to the problem of ever-increasing medical costs; rising numbers of uninsured people; and medical providers claiming to receive too little payment. The Health Care X Prize will develop criteria to evaluate solutions to these problems; Wellpoint will test the solution in one of the states in which they have a health insurance plan; and, the winner will receive about $10 million.

This is one of the most intractable problems facing the U.S. and the world. Everyone wants better health. More medicine equals better health and a longer life. The huge middle class and upper middle class populations in advanced, industrialized countries have the resources to spend on better health and greater longevity. It is only natural that these cultures spend more and more on health care. Solving this problem deserves more than $10 million!!

Let’s see… everyone wants immediate access to the highest quality medical care. Nobody really wants to pay for the medical care – as an example, just a few years ago grocery workers went on strike for over 6 months in California because their co-payment went from $5 for a doctors office visit to $10 per visit. Yet, I suspect many of the people striking over the unfairness of paying $10 to see a doctor pay much more than that for cell phone service, cable television, and a few cafe lattes each month. No one is striking over the high cost of these items – but ask someone to pay $10 to see a doctor and you have a problem.

So, everyone wants health insurance; nobody wants to pay for it; everyone wants someone else to pay for it; and, no matter who pays for it; health insurance is expensive. Yes, the XPrize is needed to solve this problem. For a previous article on this problem, see No Matter Who Pays for it Medical Care and Health Insurance is Expensive.

Here is my solution to the problem: Pay doctors and hospitals to encourage people to change their behavior to treat illness – rather than prescribing medicine. Make people pay when they over eat; over consume alcohol; and don’t exercise enough. Make parents pay when they give their children poor food and they end up obese at a young age. Removing the excess fat from our system – and the attendant health consequences would drastically reduce the cost of medical care. If only truly sick people received care – and all others were able to prevent illness though healthier life styles, we would reduce the cost of health care.

Ways to Control the Cost of Medical Care and Reduce the Cost of Health Insurance

March 23rd, 2009

In the debate and discussion of methods of financing high quality medical care is the daunting challenge of the ever-rising cost of care. While some may blame the insurance companies for excessive rate increases, the reality is that no matter who pays for medical care, be it insurance companies with private or commercial clients; government or taxpayers with Medicare, Medicaid (Medi-Cal in California), or SCHIP (Healthy Families in California); or individuals directly (those who do not purchase health insurance and pay cash for services); medical care is expensive.

The State of Massachusetts is discovering this reality in their experiment to mandate that everyone in the state have medical insurance. In this article in the New York Times, state officials speak about ways to limit the cost of medical care. That state spends 33 percent more for medical care than the national average.

According to the NYT article, “They want a new payment method that rewards prevention and the effective control of chronic disease, instead of the current system, which pays according to the quantity of care provided…The commission is looking at various options, but all would do away with the fee-for-service system, which provides perverse incentives by paying physicians and hospitals for each patient visit. The changes under consideration include reimbursing for episodes of care rather than individual visits and bundling payments to groups of providers who would together take responsibility for a patient’s health.”

Under our current system doctors and hospitals earn more money the more services, treatment and procedures that they do to diagnose and treat a patient. The more they do, the more they earn. What we know is that doing more does not always result in better outcomes. The idea of “reimbursing for episodes of care” means that a doctor or hospital would be responsible for all of the care and treatment of a specific illness. It is easier to apply this to “acute” illnesses (e.g., heart attack) where all of the treatment is provided in a single setting. The idea of reimbursing for episodic care is gaining traction. This article in the New England Journal of Medicine describes the idea in more depth.

The idea of rewarding medical providers for the care they provide, rather than for the procedures they perform, is not new. HMOs were introduced in the 1990s and actually lowered the cost of medical care. Consumers revolted however and did not want access to specialists limited. Consequently we have had run away inflation spending on medical care. Let’s hope this approach works this time.

Angela Braly, CEO of Wellpoint, Discusses Health Care Reform

March 17th, 2009

I heard Angela Braly, President and CEO of Wellpoint (parent of Anthem Blue Cross of California) speak today at the Town Hall in down town Los Angeles. Wellpoint provides health insurance to 35 million Americans – 1 in 9 people – and has $60 Billion in annual revenue. It is the largest health insurance company in the U.S. Accordingly, I thought that it would be helpful to report what she said.

Ms. Braly said that 18% of the US GDP goes for health care. She also said that 8.5% of GDP is spent by Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and other government programs. I had never heard that the US government spends so much. Most alarmingly, Ms. Braly pointed out that CMS has announced that the Medicare Trust fund which finances Part A will be bankrupt by 2016. I certainly hope that Congress fixes this problem before they expand other government health insurance programs.

Ms. Braly said that she is concerned about the quality of medical care in the US. She said that of the 17 million people who will visit a doctor this week, one-half will recieve the wrong medical advice. Further, 30% of the money spent on medicine will go towards something that will not help the patient. Medical technology does much good but also consumes much money. Our paper based medical information system doesn’t work in her opinion. Doctors and hospitals are rewarded for the quantity of their medical care, not the quality of their care. That should change.

Ms. Braly is a strong advocate of evidence-based medicine. In support of this, Ms. Braly said that Anthem Blue Cross paid $75 million to doctors in California last year as a bonus for quality improvements.

Regarding the uninsured, Ms. Braly said that we should provide coverage for all. She said that 45 million people lack coverage. The government buying coverage for people will not work however. As evidence, she pointed to the 12 million Americans who are currently eligible for government provided health insurance but not enrolled. Solving the poor enrollment practice of the government could reduce the uninsured ranks by 12 million people. That should be done.

For the uninsured who earn too much to qualify for government assistance yet not enough to affored private coverage, the government should provide “premium assistance” so that they can purchase a policy and get covered.

Ms. Braly said that individual health insurance should be tax deductible. This got a round of applause from the audience. Further, the government should provide subsidies to small businesses so that they can provide group health insurance to their employees.

Ms. Braly said that some health insurance reform is not good. She seemed to be referring to California’s attempt at health insurance reform in 2007. Anthem Blue Cross was a strong opponent of those proposals.

Ms. Braly described the personal nature of health insurance decisions and how people want any treatment – even if it is unproven – when they are facing serious illness. As an example, she described ABMT, or bone marrow treatment for breast cancer. Many advocates campaigned heavily for this treatment and 10 states mandated ABMT treatment. ABMT has now been proven to not be an effective treatment for breast cancer, according to Ms. Braly and to other medical experts. Because of the emotional attachment to a supposed cure, insurance companies were forced to pay for an unproven and ulitmately ineffective – yet very costly – medical procedure. Ms. Braly said that “we have a responsibility to make sure taht people’s treatments will work.”

Finally, Ms. Braly announced that Wellpoint has teamed up with the XPrize to fund the winning entry into a medical financing system that will deliver value at low cost.

I was very impressed with Ms. Braly’s command of the issues and the positive items she listed that will take steps to insure the uninsured and to reduce the cost of health care.